[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Open Access
AWT IMAGE
..
MeSH Browser

AWT IMAGE

..
Scopus quartile
..
Google Scholar

Citation Indices from GS

AllSince 2019
Citations27272353
h-index2322
i10-index9377

..
ORCID
..
:: Volume 7, Issue 3 ( Summer 2020) ::
Environ. Health Eng. Manag. 2020, 7(3): 203-208 Back to browse issues page
Nitrogen removal by floating constructed wetland: Decontamination of the Buriganga River
Mohammad Tahsin Islam , Irin Hossain , Ashekur Rahman Mullick , Enamul Haque
Corresponding author:Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, National Institute of Preventive and Social Medicine (NIPSOM), Dhaka, Bangladesh , irin.hossain@gmail.com
Abstract:   (3244 Views)
Background: Buriganga is considered as one of the most important river in the country. But, its water quality has changed dramatically, which is responsible for creating unfavorable conditions for aquatic life. The main aim of this study was to investigate the removal capacity of pollutants mainly nitrogen present in the Buriganga river as the most polluted rivers in Bangladesh, by floating constructed wetland.
Methods: This study was conducted under constant and variable shock loadings in two phases, namely ‘Phase I’ and ‘Phase II’ during 11 and 10 weeks, respectively, in which about 180 L of raw water was dosed into the tank containing a floating mat, and pollutant concentrations in the river water influent from the system were tested over a period of 21 weeks.
Results: Floating treatment wetland (FTW) could sustain and remove about 31.25% and 19.23% of ammonia in the 9th and 10th weeks of Phase I, respectively, and 40.63% and 56.12% in the 17th and 18th weeks of Phase II, respectively. At first, ammonia was converted to ammonium, then, to nitrite, and finally, to nitrate. As the rhizosphere was denser and the biofilm was thicker in this study, so nitrogen removal efficiency during the application of shock loading in the 17th and 18th weeks of Phase II was considerable. The removal percentage of nitrite was 76.12 and 80%, respectively. In regular dosing of raw water in the 11th and 19th weeks in Phase I and Phase II, respectively, the total nitrate removal efficiencies from influent were 31.91 and 43.33%, respectively.
Conclusion: As water resources are limited, so improvement of water quality of the polluted Buriganga river would act as an important source of reusable water.
Keywords: Nitrogen, Nitrites, Nitrates, Ammonium compounds, Water quality, Wetlands, Bangladesh
eprint link: http://eprints.kmu.ac.ir/id/eprint/34961
Full-Text [PDF 536 kb]   (1609 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Article | Subject: General
Received: 2020/09/26 | Accepted: 2020/07/31 | Published: 2020/10/10
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Tahsin Islam M, Hossain I, Mullick A R, Haque E. Nitrogen removal by floating constructed wetland: Decontamination of the Buriganga River. Environ. Health Eng. Manag. 2020; 7 (3) :203-208
URL: http://ehemj.com/article-1-643-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 7, Issue 3 ( Summer 2020) Back to browse issues page
Environmental Health Engineering And Management Journal Environmental Health Engineering And Management Journal
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 47 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645