<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<journal>
<title>Environmental Health Engineering and Management Journal</title>
<title_fa>Environmental Health Engineering and Management Journal</title_fa>
<short_title>Environ. Health Eng. Manag.</short_title>
<subject>Medical Sciences</subject>
<web_url>http://ehemj.com</web_url>
<journal_hbi_system_id>1</journal_hbi_system_id>
<journal_hbi_system_user>admin</journal_hbi_system_user>
<journal_id_issn>2423-3765</journal_id_issn>
<journal_id_issn_online>2423-4311</journal_id_issn_online>
<journal_id_pii>8</journal_id_pii>
<journal_id_doi>7</journal_id_doi>
<journal_id_iranmedex></journal_id_iranmedex>
<journal_id_magiran></journal_id_magiran>
<journal_id_sid>14</journal_id_sid>
<journal_id_nlai>8888</journal_id_nlai>
<journal_id_science>13</journal_id_science>
<language>en</language>
<pubdate>
	<type>jalali</type>
	<year>1400</year>
	<month>12</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<pubdate>
	<type>gregorian</type>
	<year>2022</year>
	<month>3</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<volume>9</volume>
<number>2</number>
<publish_type>online</publish_type>
<publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
<article_type>fulltext</article_type>
<articleset>
	<article>


	<language>en</language>
	<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
	<title_fa></title_fa>
	<title>Comparing the performance of UV/Acetylacetone and UV/O3 processes for treatment of olive mill wastewater</title>
	<subject_fa>تخصصي</subject_fa>
	<subject>Special</subject>
	<content_type_fa>مقاله اصیل</content_type_fa>
	<content_type>Original Article</content_type>
	<abstract_fa></abstract_fa>
	<abstract>&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Background: Olive mill wastewater (OMW) is characterized by its high organic content and refractory compounds. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the efficiency of UV/O3 and UV/ acetylacetone (UV/AcAc) processes for treatment of pretreated OMW by coagulation/microfiltration (C&amp;M) process.&lt;br&gt;
Methods: In this study, a laboratory-scale UV plug flow reactor with ancillary equipment was fabricated. The experimental factors including initial pH (5-9), O3 dosages (1.5-4.5 g/h), and AcAc concentrations (0.01-0.03 M) were measured. For both processes, a reaction time of 120 min was considered. The effect of these variables on removal of wastewater contaminants including BOD, COD, TSS, turbidity, phenol, oil, and grease were investigated.&lt;br&gt;
Results: Results showed that raw OMW has a high load of pollutants and very low biodegradability (BOD5/COD = 0.12). In UV/O3 process, the optimal conditions were obtained at pH 8 and ozone injection at 4 g/h. The combined C&amp;M-UV/O3 process removed 78.75% COD, 46.66% BOD5, 90.88% total phenol, 91.78% TSS, 99.14% oil and grease, and 98.38% turbidity, with promotion of BOD5/ COD from 0.12 to 0.33. In UV/AcAc process, the optimal conditions were achieved at pH 5 and AcAc concentration of 0.03 M. The combined C&amp;M-UV/AcAc process removed 58.75% COD, 67.58% BOD5, 38.03% total phenol, 83.50% TSS, 93.65% oil and grease, and 95.00% turbidity, with promotion of BOD5/ COD from 0.12 to 0.22.&lt;br&gt;
Conclusion: The results showed that the UV/O3 process is completely superior to the UV/AcAc process for removal of OMW contaminants, as well as promoting the biodegradability of OMW.&lt;/div&gt;</abstract>
	<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
	<keyword>Olive mill wastewater (OMW), Treatment, UV/O3, UV/AcAc, Biodegradability</keyword>
	<start_page>115</start_page>
	<end_page>123</end_page>
	<web_url>http://ehemj.com/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1-242&amp;slc_lang=en&amp;sid=1</web_url>


<author_list>
	<author>
	<first_name>Roya</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name> Radmehr</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email>radmehrroya@gmail.com</email>
	<code>100319475328460010341</code>
	<orcid>100319475328460010341</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Mohammad</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name> Rafiee</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email>rafiee@sbmu.ac.ir</email>
	<code>100319475328460010342</code>
	<orcid>100319475328460010342</orcid>
	<coreauthor>No</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


	<author>
	<first_name>Ahmadreza </first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Yazdanbakhsh</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email>yazdanbakhsh@sbmu.ac.ir</email>
	<code>100319475328460010343</code>
	<orcid>100319475328460010343</orcid>
	<coreauthor>Yes
</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Corresponding author: Workplace Health Promotion Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


</author_list>


	</article>
</articleset>
</journal>
