[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Open Access
AWT IMAGE
..
MeSH Browser

AWT IMAGE

..
Scopus quartile
..
Google Scholar

Citation Indices from GS

AllSince 2019
Citations27642389
h-index2422
i10-index9678

..
ORCID
..
:: Volume 9, Issue 2 (Spring 2022) ::
Environ. Health Eng. Manag. 2022, 9(2): 135-145 Back to browse issues page
Public perception on environmental noise pollution: A case study in Zaria city, Kaduna state, Nigeria
Idoko Apeh Abraham , Igboro Bamedele Sunday , Sani Badrudden Saulawa , Umar Alfa Abubakar , Stephen James Ijimdiya
Corresponding author: Department of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria , apeh4life@gmail.com
Abstract:   (1748 Views)
Background: One of the key indicators of the degradation of the environment is the noise level. This has necessitated this study on the evaluation of the public, perceptional awareness, sources, effects, and mitigation measures on environmental noise pollution.
Methods: The population was estimated and 385 structured questionnaires were estimated and administered by random purposive sampling. About 358 questionnaires were retrieved. Data were analyzed using SPSS and Excel statistical software.
Results: About 90.2% of the respondents had relevant awareness and its effects on environmental noise while 9.8% of the respondent did not. Traffic, generators, commercial and light industry sources of noise, and their severity were ranked in a descending order using the Likert scale. Hearing impairment, annoyance, stress, distraction during exposure were ranked in a descending order using the Likert scale. Single-factor ANOVA on the sources of noise and their severity, awareness of the various effects of noise, and responses during exposure showed that there were significant differences as P<0.05 using a confidence level of 95%. About 61.7% of respondents complained of environmental noise, 72.6% respondents received complaints about environmental noise, 87.7% of respondents were not aware of any government agency monitoring noise pollution, 72.2% of the respondents had done nothing regarding noise prevention, and 91.1% respondents wanted a proactive decision in mitigating environmental noise pollution.
Conclusion: There is an inadequate coping strategy. Strategic planning in mitigating environmental noise in urban and semi-urban areas is a necessity and there is a need for public enlightenment by government monitoring agencies.
Keywords: Noise, Perceptions, Environment pollution, Questionnaires, Strategic planning and government
Full-Text [PDF 1468 kb]   (1294 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Article | Subject: General
Received: 2022/05/11 | Accepted: 2022/03/26 | Published: 2022/06/22
Supplementary file [PDF 93 KB]  (83 Download)
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Abraham I A, Bamedele Sunday I, Badrudden Saulawa S, Alfa Abubakar U, James Ijimdiya S. Public perception on environmental noise pollution: A case study in Zaria city, Kaduna state, Nigeria. Environ. Health Eng. Manag. 2022; 9 (2) :135-145
URL: http://ehemj.com/article-1-947-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 9, Issue 2 (Spring 2022) Back to browse issues page
Environmental Health Engineering And Management Journal Environmental Health Engineering And Management Journal
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 47 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645