[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Open Access
AWT IMAGE
..
MeSH Browser

AWT IMAGE

..
Scopus quartile
..
Google Scholar

Citation Indices from GS

AllSince 2020
Citations38613230
h-index2825
i10-index132111

..
ORCID
..
EBSCO
..
:: Volume 12 - 2025 ::
Environ. Health Eng. Manag. 2025, 12 - 2025: 1-13 Back to browse issues page
Predicting electrical conductivity with neural networks: A comparative study of ANN, RNN, CNN, and LSTM models
Muhammad Waqas , Afed Ullah Khan , Jahanzeb Khan , Fayaz Ahmad Khan , Ateeq Ur Rauf
Corresponding author: Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology Peshawar (Bannu Campus), 28100, Bannu, Pakistan , engr. muhammadwaqas88774@ gmail.com
Abstract:   (28 Views)
Background: Electrical conductivity (EC) is an important indicator of surface water quality, primarily influenced by temperature, salinity, and human activities. The conventional EC experimental technique is resource-intensive and time-consuming. Recent advancements in machine learning provide an innovative technique for accurate EC prediction using historical time series data.
Methods: Surface water EC was assessed via four machine learning techniques, namely Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Recurrent Neural Network (RNN), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM). The predictive capability of the aforementioned models was assessed via
six statistical performance indicators, namely Coefficient of determination (R2), Percent Bia (PBias), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Relative Root Mean Square Error (RRMSE), and Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE).
Results: The findings of the present research work show that the LSTM model outperforms in predicting EC. The LSTM model’s efficacy was demonstrated by its outstanding R2 values of 0.99 and 0.94 during training and testing, respectively. Notably, RNN, ANN, and CNN ranked second, third, and fourth, respectively, based on statistical performance indicators.
Conclusion: The results show that LSTM outperforms the remaining models in predicting EC. The findings of this study can assist water quality managers in finding the optimum machine learning model for modeling EC in the understudied area. Overall, this work advances our understanding of EC prediction using machine learning techniques.
Article number: 1472
Keywords: Water quality, Rivers, Prediction, Neural networks, Machine learning
Full-Text [PDF 5325 kb]   (19 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Article | Subject: General
Received: 2025/09/21 | Accepted: 2025/01/8 | Published: 2025/01/8
supplementary File [PDF 116 KB]  (6 Download)
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Waqas M, Khan A U, Khan J, Khan F A, Rauf A U. Predicting electrical conductivity with neural networks: A comparative study of ANN, RNN, CNN, and LSTM models. Environ. Health Eng. Manag. 2025; 12 : 1472
URL: http://ehemj.com/article-1-1753-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 12 - 2025 Back to browse issues page
Environmental Health Engineering And Management Journal Environmental Health Engineering And Management Journal
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.07 seconds with 49 queries by YEKTAWEB 4718