Background: Dye and colored materials cause health risks in water and therefore, must be removed from water supplies and wastewater. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the third generation poly(amidoamine) (PAMAM) and poly (propylene imine) dendrimers (PPI-G3) in the
removal of reactive blue 19 (RB19) dye from aqueous solutions and determine the optimum conditions for the removal.
Methods: This study was performed in a laboratory and batch scale. In this study, synthetic wastewater was examined with three different concentrations of RB19 (25, 50, and 100 mg/L), different pHs (3, 7, and 10), various amounts of dendrimer (0.4, 0.8, 1.2, and 1.6 g/L), and at different times (15,
30, and 60 minutes) during the adsorption process. The remaining amount of dye was measured by spectrophotometer at 592 nm wavelength. Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms were also tested.
Results: The results showed that by increasing the reaction time and adsorbent dosage, the rate of dye removal increased while by increasing the initial dye concentration and pH, the dye removal efficiency was significantly decreased. In this study, with increase of pH from 3 to 10, dye removal efficiency at a concentration of 25 mg/L, decreased from 72% to 20% and 88% to 17% by PAMAM and PPI dendrimers, respectively. Excel software was used for data analysis.
Conclusion: Both adsorbents had a good dye removal efficiency, but PPI dendrimer was more effective
in removing RB19. Adsorption data followed the Langmuir isotherm.

Background: Dukku and Kalgo rivers in Kebbi, Nigeria, provide essential ecosystem services such as drinking and domestic water, fishing, and farming. However, the safety of these rivers in terms of microplastic pollution has not been investigated. This study aimed to characterize and determine the concentration and associated risks of microplastics in both rivers.
Methods: Microplastics were extracted from water samples through filtration and analyzed using spectroscopy and microscopy.
Results: Significant concentrations of microplastics were detected in both rivers. Dukku River samples showed concentrations ranging from 125.00 to 160.30 particles/liter, while Kalgo River ranged from 119.30 to 134.70 particles/liter. Both rivers predominantly contained microplastic fibers and fragments, with fibers comprising the highest percentages (61% in the Dukku River and 56% in the Kalgo River). Microplastics in Kalgo River were predominantly sized between 0 and 100 μm, whereas in Dukku River, sizes ranged from 500 to 1000 μm. Polyamide was the dominant polymer, constituting 50% in the Dukku River and 42.50% in the Kalgo River, followed by polyethylene (34% in the Kalgo River and 25.60% in Dukku River), and polyvinyl alcohol (24.40% in Dukku River and 23.50% in Kalgo River). The predominant risk level posed by these polymers was level III (moderate risk), although polyamide posed a level IV risk (high risk). The pollution load index (PLI) for both rivers exceeded one, indicating a high risk.
Conclusion: Microplastic pollution in these rivers poses ecological and health risks. Identifying and mitigating sources of microplastic entry into the rivers is crucial to reducing exposure levels.